New school opening celebrated but is 15 years too long to plan
a school?
Last week was the opening of the Chelsea
Academy. This is the first new secondary school for over 50 years
to open in the borough. Seeing the first pupils attending the first
assembly was a wonderful reward for the 15 years spent trying to
get a school built in Chelsea. It was great to meet the new pupils
and I know the next few years will be incredibly exciting as the
school grows and takes shape.
Demand for places in our secondary schools is
high and because of this too many pupils are left disappointed at
not being able to continue their education in a Royal Borough
school. There are about 660 resident pupils in the secondary
transfer each year and only about 300 of these get a school place
in the borough. The limited number of places in the
Royal Borough has meant that only between 50 and 60 per cent of
pupils transferring to secondary school get their first preference
school.
I think it is important to give children the
opportunity to be educated locally.
The Chelsea Academy means fewer children will
have to travel out of the borough and, in some cases, accept places
in less highly rated schools. The Chelsea Academy will eventually
provide places for 1,160 pupils including a sixth form of 260
pupils.
We’ve also recognised that there is a need for
another secondary school in the north of the borough. I don’t want
it to be another 15 years before we can offer a place to families
in north Kensington at a Royal Borough school.
We need things to move more quickly than they
did for the Chelsea Academy. Of course finding a site in a densely
populated borough like ours is never going to be easy. The site we
found for the Chelsea Academy on Lots Road in SW10, just off the
King’s Road is of enormous value and we had to assemble it and hand
it over to the Academy.
But we also experienced delays getting the
Council accepted as a co-sponsor of the new academy. Despite our
many successes as a local education authority and the fact that we
had proposed the new school and provided the site there were
objections to us being sponsors.
How can we reform the system so we can get
schools built quicker? Do you agree with me that it should be
easier for educators with proven track records to expand their
provisions? Do you have thoughts on the type of school needed in
North Kensington and how it could be distinctive?
Merrick Cockell - Leader of Kensington and Chelsea
Council
This item is now closed for commenting