An urban landscape
RBKC Direct - Congestion Charging
Newsletter 01 | October 2003

Congestion Charging: coming soon?

Congestion Charging Zone - the scheme may be extended

Mr Livingstone plans to extend the Congestion Charge scheme (CCS) if re-elected. Conservative Mayoral candidate Stephen Norris plans to scrap the charge. The Council believes any extension of the CCS is premature. The indication is that congestion within the Borough has not reduced since the scheme started and some retailers are complaining about a fall in trade. Only 26 per cent of Kensington and Chelsea's Residents' Panel supported the proposals under consultation. So what are Mr Livingstone's precise plans for Kensington and Chelsea? What are the Council's concerns? And what are local people saying now?

The Mayor's plans

Precise details of Mr Livingstone's plans are, as yet, unknown. Consultation on the CCS is now not due to start before next year, with a possible implementation in spring of 2006, after the next Mayoral election set for May 2004. The proposed boundary may not follow the Borough perimeter, as one might logically expect. Instead it could have a western border going down the Earl's Court Road.

top of page

Council's concerns grow

Road showing Congestion Charging zoneWhile research initially showed the impact of congestion charging has reduced traffic levels by around 15 per cent in central London, the introduction of the CCS has not led to an overall reduction in congestion in Kensington and Chelsea. Consultants working on behalf of the Council have discovered increases in traffic flows at some key spots, including the Earl's Court one-way system.

This Council argues that more time and evidence is needed before the Mayor of London takes any decision about expanding the CCS.

Other key questions from the Council remain unanswered. Will the CCS have an effect on recruiting and retaining teachers, nurses and other key workers within the Borough? Will visitors to Kensington and Chelsea be deterred by the CCS?

When it comes to the 21,939 of residents (14 per cent)  who live outside the proposed zone, trips to local supermarkets, schools, doctors or dentists would either require the charge to be paid or trips to be planned around the times of the CCS. The answer here, from the Council's perspective, is to avoid at all costs a messy solution that divides the community. Any expanded scheme should run along the Borough boundary.

Business opinion

As far as the impact on business is concerned, the jury is still out. A recent survey of small businesses by the Royal Borough indicated that the overwhelming majority noted the CCS had a detrimental effect on their business. Prior to that, a survey in July of 500 businesses by London First found that less than half now believe the £5-a-day scheme is working.

top of page

Community View

In April, a questionnaire was sent to the Residents' Panel (a sample of residents, recruited and maintained over a period of years who are canvassed for their views on a variety of subjects). The results gave a clear indication that the local community was lukewarm about extending the CCS. 

They showed:

  • The majority (55 per cent) of residents were 'opposed' or 'strongly opposed' to an extension of the scheme
  • Only 26 per cent were in favour of extending the congestion charge to cover just part of the Borough
  • 43 per cent now drive in to the CCS less often than before

Residents wanted an unqualified answer about whether the Royal Borough would receive the 90 per cent discount on season tickets granted to residents in the original CCS. Seventy per cent of residents were adamant that the discount should apply. The Mayor of London has yet to announce his intentions on discounts.

The Mayor's new evidence

In contrast to the findings of the Council's consultation, a telephone survey of 693 Royal Borough residents and 316 non-residents commissioned by Mr Livingstone found that:

  • 43 per cent of Royal Borough residents favour the extension of the scheme to cover the Borough
  • 42 per cent oppose the extension of the scheme, even with the 90 per cent discount and the ability to drive into central London
  • 15 per cent have no opinion

Mr Livingstone's question also failed to point out that 14 per cent of Kensington and Chelsea residents might be excluded from the zone.

As Council Leader, Councillor Merrick Cockell pointed out in response: "It is clear that people want one policy that applies right across our Borough. Mr Livingstone's proposals, in contrast, would divide the Borough."

top of page

Experience it first-hand

Congestion charging sign: Have you paid? Do you agree with Councillor Cockell? According to the Earl's Court ward's newsletter: "This would be terrible for Earl's Court with every motorist… having to go in-and-out of the Zone, at some cost, most times we travel. It would also be very bad for local businesses… It is also important that there is only one zone.. [with the] same discount on season tickets granted to residents in the original Westminster zone."

The Mayor of London has been invited to visit Earl's Court to see the impact of the CCS on the community. The Council wants Mr Livingstone to witness first-hand just how effective the congestion charge is proving to be in the Royal Borough.

Over to you

Do these issues ring true for residents in other wards? Email congestioncharging.comments@rbkc.gov.uk with any questions or views on plans to extend the Congestion Charge Scheme. Your feedback is invaluable to us.


 
RBKC Direct

How do you rate this information / service?

Home | News | At your service | Local life | top of page
Accessibility | Access keys | Legal notices | Comment on this page | Feedback

Copyright © 1998–2013 The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea