Planning search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: PP/11/03352
Address: The Phene Arms, 9 Phene Street, LONDON, SW3 5NY
Ward: Royal Hospital
Polling district: 16
Listed Building Grade: N/A
Conservation area: Cheyne

Applicant details

Applicant's name: RAB Pension Trust
Applicant company name:
Contact address: Bell Cornwell LLP St Mary's Court The Broadway Amersham, BUCKS HP7 0UT

Proposal details

Application type: PP (Planning permission)
Proposed development Change of use to single family dwelling (PP/11/3552) and Change of use to single family dwelling, basement extensions and external alterations (PP/11/2421)
Date received: 06 Oct 2011
Registration date:
(Statutory start date)
06 Oct 2011
Public consultation ends: 18 Nov 2011
Application status: Appeal Decided
Target date for decision: 01 Dec 2011

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Refuse Planning Permission/Consent
Decision date: 07 Mar 2012
Conditions and reasons:

1)

The loss of this historic public house to residential use would be damaging to the value and significance of this heritage asset, and would cause harm to the character, identity and distinctiveness of the conservation area. Therefore, the proposal would fail to meet the requirements of Planning Policy Statement 5, Core Strategy policies C05, CK1, CL1 and CL3 and 'Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance for the Sustainable Management of the Historic Environment' published by English Heritage (2008).

2)

In the absence of a satisfactory s106 agreement to secure necessary planning obligations, the proposal would result in unacceptable pressure on local infrastructure (including education, health and community facilities) and would therefore be contrary to policy C1 of the Core Strategy and the Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document.

3)

In the absence of a satisfactory s106 agreement to secure ineligibility from obtaining car parking permits, the proposed development would put undue pressure on on-street car parking and would therefore be contrary to policy CT1 (c) of the Core Strategy and the Transport Supplementary Planning Document.

Informatives:

1)

Relevant Policies Used
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London adopted July 2011; the Core Strategy adopted 8 December 2010 and the 'Saved' policies of the Unitary Development Plan adopted 25 May 2002.

2)


The applicant is advised that completion of a satisfactory s106 agreement would overcome the second and third reasons for refusal listed above.

Committee details

Decision by: PSC (Planning Applications Committee)
Date:06 Mar 2012
Report item number:S21

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number: A/12/2172028 & A/12/2175522
Appeal received: 08 Mar 2012
Appeal type: NDT (Non-Determination)
Appeal procedure: SP (Special Appeal Letter)
Appeal start date: 24 May 2012
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate: 05 Jul 2012
Hearing/Inquiry date:09 Oct 2012
Number of days for Hearing/Inquiry:4
Appeal decision: DIS
Appeal decision date: 16 Jan 2013

Contact details

Planning case officer:
Planning team: South
Email: planning@rbkc.gov.uk
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.

Documents related to case PP/11/03352

There are no scanned documents.