Planning Search

1)

The proposed rear extension due to its size and positioning would breach the rear building line of extensions of the terrace at this level, failing to preserve the character and the appearance of the property, terrace group and surrounding Pembridge Conservation Area. It would also be harmful to private views from within the upper floor windows of surrounding properties, contrary to Local Plan policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL6, CL9 and CL11, adopted September 2019.

2)

The proposed roof level structures and equipment, due to their siting, scale, positioning would be an incongruous addition in a prominent location which would fail to preserve the character and the appearance of the property, roofline, terrace group and surrounding Pembridge Conservation Area. It would also be harmful to private views from within the upper floor windows of surrounding properties, contrary to Local Plan policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL6, CL8 and CL11, adopted September 2019.

1)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.

2)

Policies of Particular Relevance
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan, Local Plan 2019, and Neighbourhood Plans where relevant.