!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: CON/15/02893
Address: Site at 100 and 100A West Cromwell Road, and Shaftesbury Place, 135 Warwick Road, LONDON, W14
Ward: Abingdon
Polling district: 01
Listed Building Grade: N/A
Conservation area: N/A

Applicant details

Applicant's name: Spen Hill Development Ltd
Applicant company name: Lambert Smith Hampton
Contact address: United Kingdom House 180 Oxford Street LONDON W1D 1NN

Proposal details

Application type: CON (Conditions)
Proposed development Details required by Conditions 15 (Construction Environmental Management Plan), 18 (Considerate Constructors Membership Certificate), 21 (Risk Assessment & Method Statement for Emissions Control) and 22 (Low Emissions Strategy) of PP/11/00107 (Erection of five buildings (up to a maximum of 13 storeys in height including basement level) to provide a maximum of 278 residential units, provision of an extension at ground floor level to existing retail store of 1722 sqm (NIA), community and leisure facilities (comprising 3880 sqm gross external area), creche facility and cafe, hard and soft landscaping, provision of parking and cycle spaces, provision of vehicular and pedestrian access, improvements to the existing public realm and all ancillary and associated works, servicing, storage, plant and equipment.).
Date received: 08 May 2015
Registration date:
(Statutory start date)
15 May 2015
Public consultation ends: 08 Jun 2015
Application status: Appeal Decided
Target date for decision: 10 Jul 2015

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Discharge of Conditions - Split Decision
Decision date: 02 Jul 2015
Conditions and reasons:

Condition 18 (Considerate Contractor).

Conditions 15 (Construction Environmental Management Plan), 21 (Risk Assessment and method statement for emissions control ), 22 (Low Emissions Strategy).

1)

The Construction Environmental Management Plan does not satisfactorily demonstrate how noise, vibration and dust will be mitigated throughout the demolition and construction phases of the development contrary to Core Strategy Policies CE5 and CE6.

2)

The risk assessment and method statement for emissions control does not provide an inventory and timetable of dust generating activities, emission control methods and air quality monitoring to satisfactorily demonstrate how dust and emissions will be mitigated throughout the demolition and construction phases of the development contrary to Core Strategy Policies CE5 and CE6.

3)

The low emissions strategy does not satisfactorily demonstrate how the development would achieve a reduction in NOx and PM10 emissions from both transport and stationary sources contrary to Core Strategy Policy CE5.

Informatives:

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided under delegated powers.

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number: W/15/3130316
Appeal received: 17 Jul 2015
Appeal type: REF (Refusal of Permission)
Appeal procedure: WR (Written Representations)
Appeal start date: 22 Jul 2015
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate: 26 Aug 2015
Appeal decision: WDR
Appeal decision date: 24 Dec 2015

Contact details

Planning case officer: Allison Flight
Planning team: Strategic Developments Team
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.

Documents related to case CON/15/02893