Planning Search

1)

By reason of its height, scale and bulk, the roof extension would disrupt the predominantly uniform historic butterfly roofline of this group of properties, and would fail to preserve the character and the appearance of the conservation area and harm the appearance of the property and group. Therefore, the development would be contrary to the statutory requirement for a conservation area, policies of the development plan, in particular Consolidated Local Plan policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL6, CL8 and CL11, adopted July 2015 and the Norland Neighbourhood Plan policy N2, adopted March 2014.

1)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.

2)

Policies of Particular Relevance
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan 2015 (Consolidated with Alterations since 2011); the Consolidated Local Plan 2015 and the 'Saved' policies of the Unitary Development Plan adopted 25 May 2002.