Planning Search

1)

The extension at second floor level by reason of its bulk, location and design fails to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the host property, the terrace of which it forms part, or this part of the conservation area contrary to policies contained within the development plan in particular Core Strategy Policies CL1, CL2, and CL3 and saved Unitary Development Plan Policies CD47 and CD63.

2)

The applicant has failed to demonstrate, in particular by way of a lack of information, that the extension would not have a negative impact on the amenity of neighbouring occupiers, contrary to policies of the development plan, in particular policy CL5 of the Core Strategy and saved policy CD47 of the Unitary Development Plan.

1)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.

2)

Relevant Policies Used
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London adopted July 2011; the Core Strategy adopted 8 December 2010 and the 'Saved' policies of the Unitary Development Plan adopted 25 May 2002.