!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: PP/14/03551
Address: 96-98 Princedale Road and land at rear facing Pottery Lane, LONDON, W11
Ward: Norland
Polling district: 11
Listed Building Grade: N/A
Conservation area: Norland

Applicant details

Applicant's name: studioAitken
Applicant company name: studioaitken
Contact address: 105 Southwood Lane London London N6 5TB

Proposal details

Application type: PP (Planning permission)
Proposed development Refurbishment and alterations to two dwellings and development of additional two storey Mews house to land at rear facing Pottery Lane.
Date received: 09 Jun 2014
Registration date:
(Statutory start date)
09 Jun 2014
Public consultation ends: 11 Jul 2014
Application status: Appeal Decided
Target date for decision: 04 Aug 2014

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Refuse Planning Permission/Consent
Decision date: 09 Sep 2014
Conditions and reasons:

1)

The proposed fenestration to the front elevations of 96 and 98 Princedale Road, by reason of their size, arrangement and detailed design would constitute insensitive and unsympathetic alterations which would harm the character and appearance of the host building and surrounding conservation area, contrary to relevant policies of the Council's development plan, in particular Core Strategy policies CL1, CL2, CL3 and 'saved' Unitary Development Plan policy CD63.

2)

The proposed fenestration to the front elevations of the proposed dwelling on Pottery Lane, by reason of their size, arrangement and detailed design would constitute insensitive and unsympathetic feature which would detract from the design quality of the proposed dwelling and would fail to preserve the character and appearance of this part of the Norland Conservation Area, contrary to relevant policies of the Council's development plan, in particular Core Strategy policies CL1, CL2, CL3, 'saved' Unitary Development Plan policies CD55 and CD63 and policy N1 of the Norland Neighbourhood Plan.

3)

The applicant has failed to demonstrate, in the absence of a satisfactory planning obligation, that the proposed development would mitigate its impact on infrastructure including education facilities, health facilities, and community facilities, contrary to policy C1 of the Core Strategy adopted 8 December 2010 and the Planning Obligations SPD adopted 17 August 2010.

4)

The applicant has failed to demonstrate, in the absence of a satisfactory planning obligation, that the proposed development would mitigate its impact on parking and highways, contrary to policy CT1 of the Core Strategy adopted 8 December 2010 and the Transport SPD adopted 10 December 2008.

Informatives:

1)

Policies of Particular Relevance
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London adopted July 2011; the Core Strategy adopted 8 December 2010 and the 'Saved' policies of the Unitary Development Plan adopted 25 May 2002.

2)

Refused despite pre-app advice
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website, and offers a pre-application advice service. Pre-application advice was sought and provided. Unfortunately, this advice was not adhered to. Nevertheless, the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of a new planning application.

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided under delegated powers.

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number: A/14/2226703
Appeal received: 03 Oct 2014
Appeal type: REF (Refusal of Permission)
Appeal procedure: WR (Written Representations)
Appeal start date: 23 Oct 2014
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate: 27 Nov 2014
Appeal decision: DIS
Appeal decision date: 13 Jan 2015

Contact details

Planning case officer: Kevin Savage
Planning team: North
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.

Documents related to case PP/14/03551