Planning Search

1)

Prior approval under Class A of Part 16 Schedule 2 of the Town & Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended) is required and hereby withheld. The harm identified has been weighed against the advice in the NPPF promoting the growth of new and existing communications infrastructure, and the fact that the kiosk allows wheelchair users access, however, these factors, or any other matter, are not sufficient to outweigh the harm to the character and appearance of the area due to its size, intrinsic design, that it would add to existing street clutter and that it would reduce the available clear footway below an acceptable level. The proposal, therefore, conflicts with the aims of policies CL1, CL3, CL11, CL6, CR4 and CR6 of the Consolidated Local Plan, and with the standards of the Transport and Streets SPD.

1)

Reason to Grant (Planning)
PLANNING APPLICATIONS Summary of Reasons for Decision 1. You are advised that the (please enter proposal here) was determined by the Local Planning Authority with regard to the policies in the Council's Unitary Development, and was considered to comply with these policies. In particular, the following policies were considered: DELETE OR ADD AS APPROPRIATE CD27 (high standards of design) CD44 (to resist roof additions) CD45 (to permit roof additions) CD47 (to resist extensions) CD48 (Conservatories) CD49 (to resist side extensions) CD52 (to resist the installation of plant and equipment) CD53 ( to permit satellite dishes and antennas) CD54 (to resist off-street car parking in forecourts and gardens) CD61 (preserve and enhance character and appearance of Conservation Areas) 2. Weight was also given to relevant local Supplementary Planning Guidance and Statements, in particular the (to be filled in or deleted by officer as necessary) 3. The material circumstances of the case, including site history, location, and impact on amenities were considered. 4. In addition, consideration was given to the results of public consultation. 5. It was concluded that there was no significant impact upon the amenities of adjoining occupiers that could justify a refusal in this case. The full report is available for public inspection at the Planning Information Office, Room 325, Town Hall, Hornton Street, London, W8 7NX