!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: PP/18/00575
Address: Garages East of 1 Wharfedale Street and 3A Wharfedale Street, LONDON, SW10 9AN
Ward: Redcliffe
Polling district: 15
Listed Building Grade: N/A
Conservation area: Boltons

Applicant details

Applicant's name: 1 Redcliffe Square Ltd and Leander Properties Ltd
Applicant company name: Brookes Architects Ltd
Contact address: Upstairs at The Grange Bank Lane London SW15 5JT

Proposal details

Application type: PP (Planning permission)
Proposed development Demolition of two double garages flanking the entrance building of Coleherne Mews and development of chauffeur's restroom and one bedroom duplex apartment along Wharfedale Street.
Date received: 25 Jan 2018
Registration date:
(Statutory start date)
26 Jan 2018
Public consultation ends: 02 Mar 2018
Application status: Appeal Decided
Target date for decision: 23 Mar 2018

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Refuse Planning Permission/Consent
Decision date: 25 Apr 2018
Conditions and reasons:

1)

The proposed properties, by virtue of their small size, siting, poor outlook and deficient access to daylight/sunlight, would be substandard forms of residential accommodation that would fail to ensure good living conditions for the occupants of the units, contrary to policy CL5 of the Consolidated Local Plan.

2)

When viewed from the garden of number 12 Coleherne Road, and the garden, lower ground & ground floor of number 10 Coleherne Road, the proposed building would have an overbearing appearance by virtue of its excessive height and close proximity to these properties. This would result in an undue sense of enclosure that would be contrary to Consolidated Local Plan policy CL5.

3)

The proposed buildings, by reason of their excessive height, massing and bulk in the context of the site, would create discordant and incongruous bookends that would detract from the host terrace and would compete with the more opulent and attractive buildings they would adjoin. Consequently, the proposal would fail to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the terrace and wider conservation area, contrary to policies CL1, CL2, CL3, and CL11 of the Consolidated Local Plan.

4)

The applicant has failed to agree to enter into a legal agreement to secure the proposed residential accommodation to be resident's parking permit free. In the absence of such an agreement, the proposal would result in an increase in on-street parking in the Borough, contrary to Policy CT1 of the Consolidated Local Plan, and the guidance contained within the Council's adopted Transport and Streets Supplementary Planning Document.

Informatives:

1)

Refused despite pre-app advice
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website, and offers a pre-application advice service. Pre-application advice was sought and provided. Unfortunately, this advice was not adhered to. Nevertheless, the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of a new planning application.

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided under delegated powers.

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number: W/18/3205306
Appeal received: 19 Jun 2018
Appeal type: PP
Appeal procedure: W
Appeal start date: 30 Oct 2018
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate: 04 Dec 2018
Appeal decision: DIS
Appeal decision date: 10 Apr 2019

Contact details

Planning case officer: Philip Elliott
Planning team: Fast Track Team
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.

Documents related to case PP/18/00575