Planning Search

1)

The proposal does not specify particular uses within classes D1 and D2 and fails to mitigate the harm to the vitality that the area would experience through the loss of a small office. The proposal fails to comply with policy CF5 of the Consolidated Local Plan.

2)

The lack of specification over use within classes D1 and D2 means that the proposal is unable to demonstrate that there would be no harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupants and fails to comply with policy CL5 of the Consolidated Local Plan.

3)

The proposal fails to demonstrate that the potential increase in visitors to the premises would not increase risk to public and highway safety and fails to provide evidence that bicycle storage would be available on site. The proposal would fail to comply with policy CT1 of the Consolidated Local Plan.

4)

The proposal fails to provide evidence that refuse and recycling storage would be available on site. The proposal would fail to comply with policy CE3 of the Consolidated Local Plan.

1)

Policies of Particular Relevance
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan 2015 (Consolidated with Alterations since 2011); the Consolidated Local Plan 2015 and the 'Saved' policies of the Unitary Development Plan adopted 25 May 2002.

2)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.