!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: CON/23/06026
Address: 19 Mallord Street, LONDON, SW3 6AP
Ward: Stanley
Polling district: 18
Listed Building Grade: N/A
Conservation area: Chelsea Park/Carlyle

Applicant details

Applicant's name: The Third Space Group Limited
Applicant company name: Gerald Eve LLP
Contact address: One Fitzroy 6 Mortimer Street London W1T 3JJ

Proposal details

Application type: CON (Conditions)
Proposed development Details required by condition 13 (Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP)) of planning permission 20/04812 (Change of use of basement, ground and three upper storeys from former telephone exchange (Sui Generis) to new health and fitness club; creation of small single storey rear extension at basement level; excavation for a swimming pool at basement level; alterations to entrances and external paving; and other works and improvements to building)
Date received: 15 Sep 2023
Registration date:
(Statutory start date) 		15 Sep 2023
Public consultation ends: 13 Oct 2023
Application status: Decided
Target date for decision: 10 Nov 2023

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Discharge of Conditions - Refuse
Decision date: 10 Nov 2023
Conditions and reasons:

1)

The submitted Construction Traffic Management Plan is insufficient, inadequate and fails to comply with the requirements of condition 13 (Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP)) of planning permission ref. PP/20/04812. The proposal therefore fails to comply with the requirements of Policies CL7, CT1, CL5 as such Condition 13 cannot be discharged until all the relevant information required has been submitted and approved by the local planning authority.

Informatives:

1)

Unique text
Further amendments should be made to the final CTMP and they should include: ú Q8 - As stated in the pre-app comments, all that is required is the routing description. The other items are superfluous, cause confusion, and must be removedÿ ú Q13 - The answer should be simply, "no"ÿ ú Q14 - The response is confusing and does not describe how spoil will be removedÿ ú Q18 - Greater detail is requiredÿ ú Q20 - The response is a generic cut and paste and should be site specificÿ ú Q25 - This is simply cut & pasted from the pre-app comment. If the answer is "yes" then details are required to be included in the CTMP, drawings of any pedestrian or vehicle diversions are requiredÿ ú Q28 - The length of parking suspension is required. The inserted drawings are not.ÿ úÿQ33 - The response does not answer the questionÿÿ ú Site setup drawings are required to be scaled at the correct size and resolution. They should be appended to the CTMP to form a standalone documentÿ

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided under delegated powers.

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number:
Appeal received:
Appeal type:
Appeal procedure:
Appeal start date:
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate:
Appeal decision:
Appeal decision date:

Contact details

Planning case officer: Julia Drzewicka
Planning team: South
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.

Documents related to case CON/23/06026