1)
The development is unacceptable in that the applicant has failed to demonstrate that it would provide the maximum reasonable amount of affordable housing contrary to Policies CA6 and CH2 of the Consolidated Local Plan (2015) and Policy 3.12 of the London Plan 2015.
2)
The application is unacceptable in the absence of a completed satisfactory Section 106 Agreement to secure the necessary planning obligations to mitigate the impact of the development on Borough services and infrastructure as required by Policies CA6 and C1 of the Consolidated Local Plan (2015), the Council's Planning Obligations SPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan.
3)
The application is unacceptable in that the proposed layout, form and scale of the development would not represent a coherent scheme that responds to the character of the area and creates a sense of place. Contrary to Policies CL1, CL2, CR1 and CR2 of the Consolidated Local Plan (2015) and 3.5, 7.4 and 7.5 of the London Plan.
4)
The application is unacceptable in that the layout results in an unengaging, poorly defined and inactive public realm and illegible street network, which would not be well connected to the surrounding context. Contrary to Policy CR1 and CL1 of the Consolidated Local Plan (2015) and 7.1, 7.3 and 7.5 of the London Plan.
5)
The application is unacceptable in that it would not provide any disabled car parking spaces and motorcycle parking spaces contrary to Policy CT1 of the Consolidated Local Plan (2015) and the Council's Transport SPD and Policy 6.13 of the London Plan.
6)
The Transport Assessment which accompanies the application fails to demonstrate that the Earls Court development and changes in the availability in coach parking since 2012 would have acceptable transport impacts contrary to Policy CT1 of the Consolidated Local Plan (2015) and the Council's Transport SPD.