Planning Search

1)

The failure to retain any unexcavated area to the rear of the property would have an adverse impact on the character and appearance of the property, terrace and wider conservation area and would result in increased risk of surface water flooding. For these reasons the proposal would be contrary to policy, in particular Core Strategy policies CL1, 2, 3, CR6 and CE2, 'saved' Unitary Development Plan policy CD63, the Subterranean Development and Trees and Development Supplementary Planning Documents and the Cheyne Conservation Area Proposals Statement.

1)

Relevant Policies Used
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London adopted July 2011; the Core Strategy adopted 8 December 2010 and the 'Saved' policies of the Unitary Development Plan adopted 25 May 2002.

2)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.