Planning Search

1)

The proposed rear extension, by virtue of its design, and materials is detrimental to the special architectural character and historic interest of the listed building. As such the proposal is contrary to policy expressed in the Core Strategy, in particular Policies CL1, CL2, CL3, and CL4, to policy expressed in the Unitary Development Plan, in particular "saved" Policies CD47 and CD63.

2)

The proposed internal alterations by virtue of the removal of original fabric and their impact on the original plan form, would be detrimental to the special architectural character and historic interest of the listed building. As such the proposals are contrary to policy expressed in the Core Strategy, in particular Policy CL4.

1)

Relevant Policies Used
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London adopted July 2011; the Core Strategy adopted 8 December 2010 and the 'Saved' policies of the Unitary Development Plan adopted 25 May 2002.