!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: OB/15/07790
Address: Development Site At 117 - 125 Bayswater Road, 2 - 6 Queensway, Consort House And 7, Fosbury Mews, London
Ward:
Polling district:
Listed Building Grade: N/A
Conservation area: N/A

Applicant details

Applicant's name: City of Westminster
Applicant company name: City of Westminster
Contact address: Development Planning Westminster City Hall PO Box 732 Redhill, RH1 9FL

Proposal details

Application type: OB (Observations)
Proposed development This Council is asked for its observations on an application submitted to the City of Westminster 15/10671/FULL for Demolition and redevelopment of 117 to 125 Bayswater Road, together with 2 to 6 Queensway and 7 Fosbury Mews for a new building comprising 3 basements, ground and 9 upper storeys to include 55 residential units and ancillary residential facilities (class C3), together with retail (class A1) and/or car showroom (sui generis) unit, a retail (class A1) and/or restaurant (class A3) unit, a dentist (class D1) and a spa/re use (class D2), highway works and the use of car parking within the basement of consort house.
Date received: 07 Dec 2015
Registration date:
(Statutory start date) 		07 Dec 2015
Application status: Decided
Target date for decision: 28 Dec 2015

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Raise Objections
Decision date: 23 Dec 2015
Conditions and reasons:

1)

Objection is raised on the grounds that the development, because of its excessive height, bulk, massing and forward building line, would be an overly dominant and unsympathetic addition to the townscape. The development would be visible from within a conservation area of the Royal Borough, and from the Grade I registered Kensington Gardens, and would detract from these views. The proposals would fail to preserve the character and appearance of the Kensington Palace Conservation Area, and the setting of the Grade I Registered Garden, contrary to CLP policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL4, CL11 and CL12.

Informatives:

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided under delegated powers.

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number:
Appeal received:
Appeal type:
Appeal procedure:
Appeal start date:
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate:
Appeal decision:
Appeal decision date:

Contact details

Planning case officer: Kevin Savage
Planning team: North
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.

Documents related to case OB/15/07790