!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: TP/98/01354
Address: 14 HOLLAND PARK, KENSINGTON, W.11
Ward: Holland
Polling district: 10
Listed Building Grade: II
Conservation area: Holland Park

Applicant details

Applicant's name: MJN Limited,
Applicant company name:
Contact address: 21 Garlick Hill London EC4V 2AU

Proposal details

Application type: TP (Pre Acolaid cases)
Proposed development Erection of a rear basement extension
Date received: 16 Jul 1998
Registration date:
(Statutory start date)
17 Jul 1998
Application status: Appeal Decided
Target date for decision: 11 Sep 1998

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Withdrawn - Appeal against non-determine
Decision date: 24 Nov 1999
Conditions and reasons:

1)

The proposal involves the replacement of the existing rear extension with one of considerably greater volume and width. It is considered that the bulk, width, projection, and design detail of the proposed extension would produce a visually obtrusive structure without precedent in this terrace, and would result in an unacceptable degree of harm to the integrity of this building, the special architectural character and historic interest of this group of Listed buildings, and to the character and appearance of this part of the Conservation Area. As such, the proposal is contrary to Policies of the Unitary Development Plan, in particular Policies CD25, CD41, CD44, CD48, CD52, CD53 and CD58.

2)

Whilst the existing rear extension incorporates a roof terrace, the proposed extension would cover the whole width of the building and introduce a walkway very close to the boundary with No. 15 Holland Park Avenue adjacent. It is considered that this would result in a degree of intrusion upon the privacy of that property in excess of that existing at present, materially reducing the level of privacy presently enjoyed by the occupants of the neighbouring property. As such, it is considered that the proposal is contrary to Policy CD41(h) and CD30 of the Unitary Development Plan.

Informatives:

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided by the Planning Applications Committee.
Date:13 Jan 1999
Report item number:2001

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number: A/99/1027207 & /E/99/1027205
Appeal received: 11 Aug 1999
Appeal type: REF (Refusal of Permission)
Appeal procedure: IH (Informal Hearing)
Appeal start date: 11 Aug 1999
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate: TBC
Appeal decision: WDR
Appeal decision date: 07 Oct 1999

Contact details

Planning case officer:
Planning team: Fast Track Team
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.

Documents related to case TP/98/01354