Planning Search

1)

The proposed roof extension would, by reason of its bulk, design to the rear and siting on a largely unbroken terrace would be overly prominent, visually obtrusive and incongruous on the roofslope of these two properties. The proposals would neither preserve nor enhance the character or appearance of the buildings, terrace and wider conservation area, contrary to policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL6, CL8 and CL11 of the Local Plan 2019 and the guidance contained in the Queens Gate Conservation Area Appraisal.

2)

The applicant has failed to agree to enter into a legal agreement to secure the new residential unit to be residents parking permit free. In the absence of such an agreement, the proposal would result in an increase in on-street parking in the Borough, contrary to policy CT1 of the Local Plan 2019, and the guidance contained within the Council's Transport and Streets Supplementary Planning Document.

1)

Policies of Particular Relevance
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan 2015 (Consolidated with Alterations since 2011); the Consolidated Local Plan 2015 and the 'Saved' policies of the Unitary Development Plan adopted 25 May 2002.

2)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.