!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: PP/20/06868
Address: 107 Oakley Street, LONDON, SW3 5NR
Ward: Chelsea Riverside
Polling district: 04
Listed Building Grade: 2
Conservation area: Cheyne

Applicant details

Applicant's name: RG Airspace Developments Limited
Applicant company name: Davies Murch
Contact address: 86-90 Paul Street London EC2A 4NE

Proposal details

Application type: PP (Planning permission)
Proposed development Change of use of ground to fourth floor from a house of multiple occupation to reprovide one existing one bed unit, three studios (C3 use class) and associated cycle and bin storage.
Date received: 08 Dec 2020
Registration date:
(Statutory start date)
09 Dec 2020
Public consultation ends: 08 Jan 2021
Application status: Appeal Decided
Target date for decision: 03 Feb 2021

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Refuse Planning Permission/Consent
Decision date: 03 Mar 2021
Conditions and reasons:

1)

The proposal conversion of the HMOs bedsits units into 1 bed residential flats would result in the loss of lower cost accommodation, a form of housing in great need by those residents who are unable to access market housing. The proposals are thereby contrary to Local Plan Policy CH4(a).

2)

In the absence of a legal agreement precluding the ability of future residents of the proposed dwellings to receive Residents Parking Permits for the Royal Borough, there is no mechanism to prevent the proposed dwellings from adding pressure to the existing residents parking provision in the area. Consequently, the proposal fails to comply with Local Plan (September 2019) Policy CT1, plus associated guidance contained within the 'Transport and Streets' Supplementary Planning Document.

3)

The proposals fail to demonstrate that the architectural and historic interest of the Grade II listed property would be safeguarded and that the character and appearance of the Cheyne Conservation Area would be preserved or enhanced. Thereby, the proposals fail to comply with LP policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL4, CL6 and CL11.

Informatives:

1)

Refused despite pre-app advice
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website, and offers a pre-application advice service. Pre-application advice was sought and provided. Unfortunately, this advice was not adhered to. Nevertheless, the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of a new planning application.

2)

Relevant Policies Used
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London adopted July 2011; the Core Strategy adopted 8 December 2010

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided under delegated powers.

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number: W/21/3281306 - 3283534
Appeal received: 19 Aug 2021
Appeal type: PP
Appeal procedure: W
Appeal start date: 31 May 2022
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate: 05 Jul 2022
Appeal decision: ALL
Appeal decision date: 22 Dec 2022

Contact details

Planning case officer: Ronaldo Colalillo
Planning team: South
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.

Documents related to case PP/20/06868