Planning Search

1)

The proposed roof extension due to its overall form, design and appearance, would disrupt the architectural composition of the roofscape and building. The development would consequently be an inappropriate and negative form of development that would be at odds with the character and appearance of the property, group of buildings of which it forms part of Philbeach Conservation Area. Therefore, the development would be contrary with policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL6, CL8, CL9 and CL11 of the Local Plan and the requirements as set out in the NPPF.

1)

Refused despite pre-apps and discussions
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website, and offers a pre-application advice service. Pre-application advice was sought and provided, and improvements recommended during assessment of the application. Unfortunately this advice was not adhered to. Nevertheless, the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of a new planning application.