Planning Search

1)

The proposed mansard roof addition would result in the loss of the traditional V-shaped roof form of historic interest; and it would detract from the uniform roofscape and roofline of a terrace group of properties that is only broken by isolated roof additions, and by reason of its unsympathetic design and projection above the height of neighbouring properties, the development would appear incongruous, out of place and character with the terrace group on which it forms part, and with the surrounding townscape, thereby failing to preserve the character and appearance of the host building, group of buildings, and this part of the Colville Conservation Area, and the views enjoyed within it, contrary to the policies of the Local Plan 2019, in particular policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL6, CL8, and CL11 and guidance within the NPPF.

1)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.