!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: PP/24/01976
Address: 69 Cornwall Crescent, LONDON, W11 1PJ
Ward: Norland
Polling district: 11
Listed Building Grade: N/A
Conservation area: Ladbroke

Applicant details

Applicant's name: Municipal Ltd
Applicant company name: Eade Planning Ltd
Contact address: OCC Building A 105 Eade Road London N4 1TJ

Proposal details

Application type: PP (Planning permission)
Proposed development Erection of a part single, part three storey rear extension; erection of mansard roof extension in association with the subdivision of the lower ground and ground floor flat to two flats; and enlargement of the third floor flat from a one bedroom flat to a two bedroom flat
Date received: 19 Mar 2024
Registration date:
(Statutory start date)
04 Apr 2024
Public consultation ends: 03 May 2024
Application status: Decided
Target date for decision: 30 May 2024

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Refuse Planning Permission/Consent
Decision date: 30 May 2024
Conditions and reasons:

1)

The proposed substantial demolition of the existing building fabric, which makes a positive contribution to the Ladbroke Conservation Area, would result in the harmful loss of the building's integrity, patina of age and original fabric, resulting in less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Ladbroke Conservation Area. The identified harm would not be outweighed by sufficient public benefits. The proposed development is therefore contrary to development plan policies, in particular CL1, CL2, CL3 and CL11 of the Local Plan 2019, and guidance in the National Planning Policy Framework.

2)

By virtue of their size, bulk, massing and unsympathetic design, the proposed rear extensions and mansard roof would fail to read as subordinate and would not be in character with the existing building, failing to ensure the original form of the building is clearly understood. As a result, the proposal fails to preserve the character and appearance of the building and fails to preserve the positive contribution it makes to the wider conservation area. The proposal fails to be consistent with Policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL6, CL9 and CL11 of the Local Plan 2019.

3)

The proposed flats, by reason of their insufficient gross internal areas (GIA), would fall well below the minimum space standards set by policy D6 of the London Plan (2021) and the technical housing standards - nationally described space standards. As such, the proposals would result in a cramped and poor quality form of residential accommodation to the detriment of the living conditions of future occupiers. The proposal would therefore be contrary to Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021 and Policy CH3 of the Local Plan 2019.

4)

Due to the size, height and positioning of the rear extension, the proposals would result in a harmful increase in the sense of enclosure to the neighbouring properties. Therefore, the proposals would not continue to ensure good living conditions for all neighbouring occupiers and would be contrary to policy CL5 of the Local Plan 2019.

5)

In the absence of a daylight and sunlight assessment, the proposals fail to demonstrate that there would not be a harmful loss of daylight to neighbouring properties. Therefore, the proposals would not continue to ensure good living conditions for all neighbouring occupiers and would be contrary to policy CL5 of the Local Plan 2019.

6)

In the absence of a Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) and details of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS), the proposed development fails to demonstrate that there would be an acceptable impact on flood risk in the Borough and is contrary to policy CE2 of the Local Plan 2019.

7)

The proposed new residential unit would require a legal agreement to secure the new residential units as parking permit free and an agreement has not been completed to secure this. Therefore, the proposals are contrary to policy CT1 of the Local Plan 2019.

Informatives:

1)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided under delegated powers.

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number:
Appeal received:
Appeal type:
Appeal procedure:
Appeal start date:
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate:
Appeal decision:
Appeal decision date:

Contact details

Planning case officer: Gabby Westley
Planning team: North
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.

Documents related to case PP/24/01976