Planning Search

1)

By reason of it being an overly scaled, unsympathetic, uncharacteristic and inappropriate form of development in this locality that does not reflect the prevailing pattern of development within this area, the development would significantly detract from the roofscape, and fail to respect or take opportunities to improve the quality and character of the existing building and its context. Consequently, the proposal would appear obtrusive in the street scene, and harm to the surrounding townscape including the setting of the adjacent Edwardes Square, Scarsdale and Abingdon Conservation Area. Therefore, the proposal is considered contrary contrary to policies CL1; CL2; CL6; CL8, and CL11 of the Local Plan 2019.

1)

Unique text
The applicant is advised that any resubmission of this scheme and subsequent applications on this site must ensure that all tenants and freeholders are notified.

2)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.