Planning Search

1)

The proposed development, by virtue of its siting, scale and design would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the host building, terrace grouping and wider townscpae. The proposed roof extension would fail to be architecturally sympathetic to the character of the building and would represent an additional storey located on top of a mansard. As such, the proposal would fail to comply with policies CL1, CL2, CL6, CL8 and CL9 of the Local Plan and the guidance within the NPPF.

1)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.