Planning Search

1)

By virtue of form, design and loss of fabric, the proposals would cause less than substantial harm to the special architectural and historic interest and heritage significance of this Grade II listed building, without providing public benefit to outweigh the harm. As such, the proposal is contrary to CL4 of the Local Plan 2019.

2)

Insufficient information has been provided to fully assess the impact of the proposed roof extension and new basement. As such, it has not been demonstrated that these works would preserve the special architectural and historic interest and heritage significance of this Grade II listed building and the proposals are therefore contrary to CL4 of the Local Plan 2019.

1)

Refused despite pre-apps and discussions
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website, and offers a pre-application advice service. Pre-application advice was sought and provided, and improvements recommended during assessment of the application. Unfortunately this advice was not adhered to. Nevertheless, the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of a new planning application.