1)
Prior approval refused as it has not been demonstrated that the development would fall within the Class A and in particular it has not been shown that the building is a detached block of flats as set out in Schedule 2, Part 20, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended).
2)
Prior approval refused as it has not been demonstrated that the development would fall within the Class A and in particular since the building has an existing additional mansard storey built after 5th March 2018, it has not been shown that the proposed works would comprise only "up to town additional storeys of new dwellinghosuese immediately above the existing topmost residential storey" together with works listed in a-d, and the works would fail to comply with Condition A.1 (c) of Schedule 2, Part 20, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) ( England) Order 2015 (as amended).
3)
Prior approval refused as the design and appearance of the building woudl be harmful in this location, which fails to meet Condition A.2 (1) (e) of Schedule 2, Part 20, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) ( England) Order 2015 (as amended).
4)
Prior approval refused as the development would cause a harmful impact upon the residential amenity of the existing building and neighbouring premises which fails to meet Condition A.2 (1) (g) of Schedule 2, Part 20, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) ( England) Order 2015 (as amended).
5)
Prior approval refused as the transport and highways impact is unacceptable in the absence of a completed legal agreement to ensure permit free flats which would lead to increased parking pressure which fails to meet Condition A.2 (1) (a) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) ( England) Order 2015 (as amended).