1)
The proposed extension by reason of its size, siting and design would fail to reinforce the architectural integrity of the host building and would disrupt the rhythm and symmetry of the terrace of which it forms a part. It would fail to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Norland Conservation Area and is in substantial conflict with Development Plan policies, in particular CL1, CL2 and CL3 of the Core Strategy and CD47, CD48 and CD63 of the UDP as well as the Norland Conservation Area Proposals Statement.