!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: PP/24/01353
Address: 36 Royal Crescent, LONDON, W11 4SN
Ward: Norland
Polling district: 11
Listed Building Grade: 2*
Conservation area: Norland

Applicant details

Applicant's name: Ward
Applicant company name: Town Planning Bureau
Contact address: Town Planning Bureau The Barn 43 Oakdene Road Redhill RH1 6BT

Proposal details

Application type: PP (Planning permission)
Proposed development Demolish part of third floor rear outrigger, extend and alter lower and upper rear outrigger, infill extension adjacent to rear outrigger, external stairs to rear and associated internal changes.
Date received: 01 Mar 2024
Registration date:
(Statutory start date)
01 Mar 2024
Public consultation ends: 29 Mar 2024
Application status: Decided
Target date for decision: 26 Apr 2024

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Grant Planning Permission/Consent
Decision date: 03 May 2024
Conditions and reasons:
Informatives:

1)

Variations to Approved Drawings
Planning permission is hereby granted for the development as shown on the approved drawings. Any variation to the approved scheme may require further permission, and unauthorised variations may lay you open to planning enforcement action. You are advised to seek advice from the Directorate of Planning and Place, before work commences, if you are thinking of introducing any variations to the approved development. Advice should urgently be sought if a problem occurs during approved works, but it is clearly preferable to seek advice at as early a stage as possible. Use the following link to see how advice can be obtained: Planning Advice Service

2)

Care in the Conservation Area
This property is within a Conservation Area. All building works should, therefore, be completed with great care. External facing work and detailed treatment should be finished in a manner sympathetic to the existing building. If there is any doubt about the way in which work should be carried out, you should seek the advice of the Directorate of Planning and Place.

3)

GTD/Pre-app/At submission Est.G/No amend
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. The scheme was submitted in accordance with advice provided through pre-application discussions.

4)

Unique text
Due to the small-scale nature of the works, under best practice guidance MoL SPG 'The Control of Dust and Emissions from Construction & Demolition Sites' and the IAQM's 'Assessment of dust from demolition and construction' the site would be determined as 'Low Risk' with regards to dust impacts. Any Environmental Management Plans, Construction Management Plans or Construction Traffic Management Plans should reference these guidance documents and include a list of the appropriate mitigation measures to be utilised on site where necessary. The physical onsite inspection for the generation of dust and soiling effects will be sufficient in this case when utilised alongside other mitigation measures.

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided under delegated powers.

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number:
Appeal received:
Appeal type:
Appeal procedure:
Appeal start date:
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate:
Appeal decision:
Appeal decision date:

Contact details

Planning case officer: Sarah Winter-Irving
Planning team: North
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.

Documents related to case PP/24/01353