1)
The proposed alteration of the valley roof form is considered to be unacceptable in that it would be an architecturally unsympathetic alteration that would harm the external appearance of this building and harm the overall character of the roofscape in this terrace. The proposal would be harmful to the external appearance of this building, the architectural balance of the terrace to which this property belongs, and would fail to preserve the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. As a consequence this proposal is contrary to policies contained within the Unitary Development Plan, most notably CD38, CD39, CD52 and CD53.
2)
The proposed stair enclosure, by reason of its design, size and scale would be an overly prominent, visually obtrusive and architecturally unsympathetic addition that would harm the external appearance of this building and the overall character and appearance of the Conservation Area. Thus the proposal is contrary to policies contained within the Unitary Development Plan, most notably CD38, CD39, CD52 and CD53.
3)
The enlargement of the rear window at rear second floor level would be an architecturally unsympathetic alteration, that would be out of scale and character with the pattern of fenestration along these rear elevations. The proposed alteration would harm the external appearance of this building and would fail to preserve the character of the Conservation Area and as a consequence is contrary to policies contained within the Unitary Development Plan, most notably CD44, CD52 and CD53.