Back to search results
This case has not yet been decided.
The proposed alterations to the rear extension would be insufficient to rectify the harm that the extension causes to the character and appearance of the Norland Conservation Area or to the special historic interest and architectural character of the property, and would legitimise the parts of the rear extension it is proposed to retain. As such, the proposals fail to have special regard to the desirability of preserving the building or the features of historic interest it possesses as required by s.66(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, and are contrary to policies of the development plan in particular policies CL1, CL3, CL4, CL6 and CL9 of the Consolidated Local Plan.
Policies of Particular RelevanceYou are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan 2015 (Consolidated with Alterations since 2011); the Consolidated Local Plan 2015 and the 'Saved' policies of the Unitary Development Plan adopted 25 May 2002.
Refused/No pre-app or discussionTo assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered.
In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.
This case has not been appealed.
The consultation period for this application has ended.
Town Hall, Hornton Street, W8 7NX
Call on 020 7361 3000
The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea