Planning Search

1)

The proposed increase in the scale of the closet wing would cause the extension to have an unsatisfactory relationship with adjoining windows, increasing the closet wings dominance and unbalancing the composition of the rear elevation. The development would cause harm to the appearance of the property and would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area. At present, the proposed development fails to provide sufficient benefits (including wider public benefits) to offset the harm to the appearance of the property and the character and appearance of the conservation area. The proposal does not comply with Core Strategy policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL4 and CL9.

2)

In the absence of a satisfactory agreement to secure ineligibility from obtaining car parking permits, the proposed development would put undue pressure upon on-street car parking and would therefore be contrary to policy CT1 (c) of the Core Strategy and the Transport Supplementary Planning Document.

1)

GTD/No pre-app/Amendmts to comply Est. G
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered, although not used in this instance. On first submission the proposals did not comply with guidance, but improvements suggested by the planning authority were adopted by the applicant.

2)

Relevant Policies Used
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London adopted July 2011; the Core Strategy adopted 8 December 2010 and the 'Saved' policies of the Unitary Development Plan adopted 25 May 2002.