Planning Search

1)

By virtue of its location, height, bulk and detailed design the proposed rear extension would harm the character and appearance of the conservation area and the appearance of the individual building. The proposals would conflict with Local Plan 2019 policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL9 and CL11 as well as the recommendations of the Norland Conservation Area Appraisal.

2)

By virtue of its location, height, bulk and detailed design the proposed rear extension would harm the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers in respect of light, the sense of enclosure and privacy.The proposals would conflict with Local Plan 2019 policies CL5.

3)

By virtue of its location, area, and detailed design the proposed roof terrace would harm the character and appearance of the conservation area and the appearance of the individual building. The proposals would conflict with Local Plan 2019 policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL8 and CL11 as well as Norland Neighbourhood Plan policy N2 and the recommendations of the Norland Conservation Area Appraisal.

1)

Policies of Particular Relevance
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan, Local Plan 2019, and Neighbourhood Plans where relevant.

2)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.