!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: TP/98/02260
Address: 34 ROYAL CRESCENT, KENSINGTON, W.11
Ward: Norland
Polling district: 11
Listed Building Grade: II*
Conservation area: Norland

Applicant details

Applicant's name: Mr. A. Ponti
Applicant company name: Peter Tigg Partnership,
Contact address: Walmer Courtyard, 225 Walmer Road, London, W11 4EY

Proposal details

Application type: TP (Pre Acolaid cases)
Proposed development Internal and external alterations to basement and ground floor to include full width, rear basement conservatory and renovation of existing rear ground floor conservatory.
Date received: 26 Nov 1998
Registration date:
(Statutory start date) 		01 Dec 1998
Application status: Appeal Decided
Target date for decision: 26 Jan 1999

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Minded to Refuse
Decision date:
Conditions and reasons:

1)

The proposed internal and external demolition works at basement and ground floor, with the loss of the original plan form, are considered to be unacceptable because of the non-reversible nature of such demolition resulting in significant harm to the special architectural character and historic interest of the Grade II* Listed building. and are therefore contrary to the Council's policies expressed in the "Conservation and Development" Chapter of the Unitary Development Plan, in particular Policies CD25, CD44, CD57 and CD58.

2)

The scale, bulk and design of the proposed first floor extension and full width basement conservatory would cause demonstrable harm to the special architectural and historic character of the Grade II* Listed building and be contrary to the Council's policies expressed in the Conservation and Development Chapter of the Unitary Development Plan, in particular Policies CD57, CD58, CD44, CD25, CD41 (i) and CD42 (d) and (e).
Informatives:

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided by the Planning Applications Committee.
Date:21 Apr 1999
Report item number:56

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number: E/99/1019351
Appeal received: 12 Mar 1999
Appeal type: NDT (Non-Determination)
Appeal procedure: WR (Written Representations)
Appeal start date: 15 Mar 1999
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate: 12 Apr 1999
Appeal decision: DIS
Appeal decision date: 13 Sep 1999

Contact details

Planning case officer:
Planning team: North
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

By law all comments are open to public inspection as they form part of the statutory register for planning applications. Unless you specify otherwise when you finish your comment and submit it, we will redact your name and address and postcode. Certain other types of personal data you provide, such as your email address and signature, will be automatically redacted.

Please note that the comments you make are in an open text box. This means that they will be visible to the public at large. Therefore, do not put any sensitive data (such as health or financial information) in this box which you do not want to be revealed to the public. Likewise, if you do not want your name and address revealed, do not write them in the text box.


I am commenting as


Comments from organisations or companies are not subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 and the name of your organisation will be displayed on the Council's website.

Data Protection Act 2018 information
Comments are published anonymously on the Council's website until a planning decision or, if applicable, an appeal decision has been made. A redacted version of your comment will be available under FOI requests for 10 years, after which time it will be deleted.

With your permission we will include your address when we publish your comments.

With your permission your comments will remain on the website after a planning decision has been made and will be permanently available under FOI requests.













Attachments

You may attach pictures or documents to support your comments. We can accept .jpg and .pdf files up to a total of 10MB.


You will receive an email receipt after you have submitted your comment.

Documents related to case TP/98/02260

Click here to comment on this case