!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: PP/23/08278
Address: 69 Campden Street, LONDON, W8 7EN
Ward: Campden
Polling district: 03
Listed Building Grade: N/A
Conservation area: Kensington

Applicant details

Applicant's name: Qureshi
Applicant company name: William Russell Architects Ltd
Contact address: Unit 1a 33 Greenwood Place LONDON NW5 1LB

Proposal details

Application type: PP (Planning permission)
Proposed development Alterations to windows on front elevation, insertion of a new sash window where there is currently a gate in the `garden wall'. Enlargement of a window in set-back side wing. New windows on rear elevation, extension of a portion of rear brickwork by 79cm at second floor level. Addition of a mansard roof to the set-back side wing. Replacement of single glazing with slimline double-glazing. Replacement of a solid parapet wall with new black painted steel railings to front first floor terrace. Installation of an air-source heat pump within an acoustic enclosure on rear first floor terrace. Raising of parapet to upper roof by 75cm around all 3 sides. Addition of a new stair access to the upper roof and new roof terrace to upper roof, set back form the parapet and surrounded by new planters. Installation of solar panels and chiller units on upper roof.
Date received: 15 Dec 2023
Registration date:
(Statutory start date) 		15 Jan 2024
Public consultation ends: 01 Apr 2024
Application status: Decided
Target date for decision: 11 Mar 2024

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Refuse Planning Permission/Consent
Decision date: 03 Apr 2024
Conditions and reasons:

1)

The proposed roof terrace and mansard roof to the side wing by reason of the overall bulk, siting, and design, would fail to read as subordinate additions to the property and fails to respond to the existing character and context of the host building and surrounding context. As a result, the proposal fails to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area and would result in less than substantial harm to this designated heritage asset. The harm would not be outweighed by any public benefits and therefore, the proposal would conflict with policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL6, CL8, CL9 and CL11 of the 2019 Local Plan.

Informatives:

1)

Refused despite pre-app advice
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website, and offers a pre-application advice service. Pre-application advice was sought and provided. Unfortunately, this advice was not adhered to. Nevertheless, the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of a new planning application.

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided under delegated powers.

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number:
Appeal received:
Appeal type:
Appeal procedure:
Appeal start date:
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate:
Appeal decision:
Appeal decision date:

Contact details

Planning case officer: McKenzie Quigg
Planning team: North
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.

Documents related to case PP/23/08278