!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: PP/17/07580
Address: Flat 14, Avenue Studios, Sydney Close, LONDON, SW3 6HW
Ward: Courtfield
Polling district: 06
Listed Building Grade: 2
Conservation area: Thurloe and Smith's Charity

Applicant details

Applicant's name: Boumeester
Applicant company name: Ivo Curwen Architecture
Contact address: 65 Tennyson Street London SW8 3SU

Proposal details

Application type: PP (Planning permission)
Proposed development Repositioning of entrance from Sydney Mews and enlargement of 1No. window. Internal alterations to non original walls and partitions on ground and first floor levels including repositioning non original staircase. Replacing metal roof trusses with timber trusses to match existing.
Date received: 06 Dec 2017
Registration date:
(Statutory start date)
06 Dec 2017
Public consultation ends: 05 Jan 2018
Application status: Appeal Decided
Target date for decision: 31 Jan 2018

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Refuse Planning Permission/Consent
Decision date: 31 Jan 2018
Conditions and reasons:

1)

The development would result in the loss of an artists' studio and would fail to protect the work space needed to support the creative, cultural industries, art, cultural uses and heritage which contribute to the character, appearance and artistic traditions across the Borough, contrary to policies CL1, CL2, CL3, and CF7 of the Consolidated Local Plan 2015.

2)

The residential use of the property, extensive opening up of the northern elevation to create one studio window and an enlarged doorway, and the internal alterations to facilitate a residential use, would result in an overly grandiose appearance which would undermine the simple, robust and modest character of this section of frontage, and a change to the building's and the complex of building's intrinsic character. The proposal would fail to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area, contrary to policies CL1, CL3, CL6, and CL11 of the Consolidated Local Plan.

3)

The extensive opening up of the northern elevation, internal alterations, and loss of historic fabric, would disrupt the existing use and function of the studio space failing to preserve its character and interest. Furthermore, the residential use of the building would fail to preserve its important and intrinsic character and layout. The proposals would fail to preserve the heritage significance of the listed buildings, their setting, and their special architectural and historic interest contrary to policy CL4 the Consolidated Local Plan.

Informatives:

1)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided under delegated powers.

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number: W/18/3208095 & Y/18/3208096
Appeal received: 27 Jul 2018
Appeal type: PP
Appeal procedure: W
Appeal start date: 22 Jan 2019
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate: 26 Feb 2019
Appeal decision: DIS
Appeal decision date: 17 Apr 2019

Contact details

Planning case officer: Philip Elliott
Planning team: Fast Track Team
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.

Documents related to case PP/17/07580