!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: PA/24/00639
Address: 10 Rutland Mews South, LONDON, SW7 1NZ
Ward: Brompton and Hans Town
Polling district: 02
Listed Building Grade: N/A
Conservation area: Brompton

Applicant details

Applicant's name: c/o Batcheller Monkhouse
Applicant company name: Batcheller Monkhouse
Contact address: 1 London Road Tunbridge Wells Kent TN1 1DH

Proposal details

Application type: PA (Prior Approval)
Proposed development Increase height of solar panels
Date received: 29 Jan 2024
Registration date:
(Statutory start date)
12 Feb 2024
Public consultation ends: 18 Mar 2024
Application status: Decided
Target date for decision: 25 Mar 2024

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Prior Approval Required - Refused
Decision date: 25 Mar 2024
Conditions and reasons:

1)

Fails to accord with Class A.2.(ba) in that the developer has failed to apply to the local planning authority for a determination as to whether the prior approval of the local planning authority will be required with respect to the impact of the appearance of the solar PV or solar thermal equipment on that land, before beginning development.

2)

Fails to accord with Class A.2. (bb) in that the development began before the occurrence of (a) the receipt by the applicant from the local planning authority of a written notice of their determination that such prior approval is not required; (b) the receipt by the applicant from the local planning authority of a written notice giving their prior approval; or (c) the expiry of 56 days following the date on which the application under sub-paragraph (3) was received by the local planning authority without the authority notifying the applicant as to whether prior approval is given or refused.

3)

Class A.2. (a) Due to the limited height of the mews property, the proposed solar panels would be clearly visible from the street and from neighbouring properties, and as a result would be harmful to the character of the property and the conservation area. The equipment has not been sited to minimise the effect on the external appearance of the building.

4)

Class A.2. (b) Due to the limited height of the mews property, the proposed solar panels would be clearly visible from the street and from neighbouring properties, and as a result would be harmful to the character of the property and the conservation area. The equipment has not been sited to minimise the effect on the amenity of the area.

Informatives:

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided under delegated powers.

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number:
Appeal received:
Appeal type:
Appeal procedure:
Appeal start date:
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate:
Appeal decision:
Appeal decision date:

Contact details

Planning case officer: Cheryl Collins
Planning team: South
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.

Documents related to case PA/24/00639