Planning Search

1)

The proposed extension, due to its scale and massing would fail to be in keeping with the terrace and or reinforce the character and integrity of the existing building and terrace. The glass balustrading, given its unsympathetic material, would fail to represent the age and character of the existing building and the neighbouring buildings. The proposal would therefore be contrary to policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL9 and CL11 of the Local Plan and the guidance within the Queens Gate Conservation Area Appraisal.

1)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.