Planning Search

1)

The proposed rear dormer, by reason of its bulk, excessive width, siting and design, would fail to read as a subordinate addition on the roofslope of the property and fail to respond to the existing character and context of the group of properties. As a result, the proposal fails to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area in conflict with Local Plan Policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL8, CL11.

1)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.