Planning Search

1)

The proposed extension would result in a cumulative development that would obscure the first floor of the property, resulting in a dominant and incongruous extension that would fail to be subordinate to the host building. The proposals would result in less than substantial harm to the designated heritage asset without providing public benefit to outweigh the harm. As such, the proposals fail to preserve the character or appearance of the building, terrace and wider conservation area, contrary to policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL4, CL9 and CL11 of the Local Plan 2019, and guidance contained within the NPPF.

1)

Policies of Particular Relevance
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan, Local Plan 2019, and Neighbourhood Plans where relevant.

2)

Refused despite pre-apps and discussions
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website, and offers a pre-application advice service. Pre-application advice was sought and provided, and improvements recommended during assessment of the application. Unfortunately this advice was not adhered to. Nevertheless, the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of a new planning application.