Planning Search

1)

The raised closet wing and new mansard style roof, by reason of the overall bulk, siting and design, would fail to read as a subordinate addition to the closet wing and would fail to respond to the existing character and context of the group of properties. As a result, the proposal fails to preserve or enahnce the character and appearnce of the conservation area in conflict with Local Plan Policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL6, CL8 and CL11.

2)

The proposed roof terrace, by reason of the height and location, would fail to protect the residential amenity of nieghbours. As a result, the proposal is in conflict with Local Plan Policy CL5.

1)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.