Back to search results Details Decision Committee Appeal Contact Comment Documents Property details Case reference: LB/24/02427 Address: 25 The Gateways, LONDON, SW3 3HX Ward: Royal Hospital Polling district: 16 Listed Building Grade: 2 Conservation area: Chelsea Applicant details Applicant's name: Cowie Applicant company name: Planning Solutions (London) Ltd Contact address: Studio 5 Hurlingham Studios Ranelagh Gardens London SW6 3PA Proposal details Application type: LB (Listed Building) Proposed development Removal of roof top water tank and housing; installation of skylight; repair or replacement of windows. Removal of partition wall between hall and dining room; partition wall between dining room and kitchen; formation of a shower room at rear of ground floor; incorporation of first floor bathroom cupboard into bedroom 2. Reinstatement of skirting, architraves and ceiling moldings Date received: 10 Apr 2024 Registration date: (Statutory start date) 22 Apr 2024 Public consultation ends: 17 May 2024 Application status: Validated and Registered Target date for decision: 17 Jun 2024 Decision details This case has not yet been decided. Decision: Decision date: Conditions and reasons: Informatives: Committee details Decision by: This case is still under consideration. Appeal details This case has not been appealed. Planning Inspectorate reference number: Appeal received: Appeal type: Appeal procedure: Appeal start date: Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate: Appeal decision: Appeal decision date: Contact details Planning case officer: Neville Palmer Planning team: South Email: [email protected] Telephone: 020 7361 3012 Comment on this application By law all comments are open to public inspection as they form part of the statutory register for planning applications. Unless you specify otherwise when you finish your comment and submit it, we will redact your name and address and postcode. Certain other types of personal data you provide, such as your email address and signature, will be automatically redacted. Please note that the comments you make are in an open text box. This means that they will be visible to the public at large. Therefore, do not put any sensitive data (such as health or financial information) in this box which you do not want to be revealed to the public. Likewise, if you do not want your name and address revealed, do not write them in the text box. Reason for commenting General comments Support Objection * Comments I am commenting as an organisation or company an individual Organisation or company name Comments from organisations or companies are not subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 and the name of your organisation will be displayed on the Council's website. Data Protection Act 2018 information Comments are published anonymously on the Council's website until a planning decision or, if applicable, an appeal decision has been made. A redacted version of your comment will be available under FOI requests for 10 years, after which time it will be deleted. With your permission we will include your address when we publish your comments. I give permission for the Council to include my address when they publish my comments. With your permission your comments will remain on the website after a planning decision has been made and will be permanently available under FOI requests. I give permission for the Council to publish my comment after a planning decision has been made and to make comments permanently available under FOI requests. * Your name * Address line 1 Address line 2 Address line 3 Address line 4 Postcode Telephone number * Email address Attachments You may attach pictures or documents to support your comments. We can accept .jpg and .pdf files up to a total of 10MB. Attachments You will receive an email receipt after you have submitted your comment. There is a problem with your form. Please check the following: Documents related to case LB/24/02427 View the available documents on the Electronic Documents and Records Management Service. Opens in a new window. Click here to comment on this case