Planning Search

1)

The proposed extension would be an incongruous addition which would emphasise the disproportionate bulk and massing of the rear projection. The extension would disrupt the pattern, rhythm, and height of rear projection to the terrace row. The extension would fail to conserve the character of the Conservation Area. The development would fail to comply with policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL6, CL8, CL9, and CL11 of the Local Plan 2019.

1)

Refused/No pre-app or discussion
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website. A pre-application advice service is also offered. In this case the proposal does not comply with guidance and policies. No pre-application discussions were entered into, but the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of any new planning application.