Planning Search

1)

The proposed rear extension, by virtue of its design, and materials is detrimental to the special architectural character and historic interest of the listed building, and would fail to preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area. As such the proposal is contrary to policy expressed in the Core Strategy, in particular Policies CL1, CL2, CL3, and CL4, to policy expressed in the Unitary Development Plan, in particular "saved" Policies CD47 and CD63.

1)

Relevant Policies Used
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London adopted July 2011; the Core Strategy adopted 8 December 2010 and the 'Saved' policies of the Unitary Development Plan adopted 25 May 2002.

2)

Refused despite pre-app advice
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website, and offers a pre-application advice service. Pre-application advice was sought and provided. Unfortunately, this advice was not adhered to. Nevertheless, the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of a new planning application.