Planning Search

1)

The proposals would be contrary to the NPPF which requires that great weight should be given to the asset's conservation and that less than substantial harm should be weighed against sufficient public benefits. The proposed demolition and re-build of the rear and part of the side fa╪ades would fail to preserve the character or appearance of the conservation area, contrary to development plan policy in particular Consolidated Local Plan policies CL1, CL2, CL3, CL9 and CL11.

1)

Policies of Particular Relevance
You are advised that this application was determined by the Local Planning authority with regard to Development Plan policies including relevant policies contained within the London Plan 2015 (Consolidated with Alterations since 2011); the Consolidated Local Plan 2015 and the 'Saved' policies of the Unitary Development Plan adopted 25 May 2002.

2)

Refused despite pre-app advice
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website, and offers a pre-application advice service. Pre-application advice was sought and provided. Unfortunately, this advice was not adhered to. Nevertheless, the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of a new planning application.