Planning Search

1)

The proposed closet wing extension at second floor level would fail to read as subordinate to the original building and fail to reinforce the character and integrity of the original building and group, rising above the general height of neighbouring and nearby extensions and disrupting the even rhythm of rear additions. The proposal would cause less than substantial harm to the listed building and group, without providing sufficient public benefit to outweigh the harm. As such, the proposal is contrary to CL4 of the Local Plan.

2)

By virtue of the impact on the character and cellular plan form, the proposed internal alterations would cause less than substantial harm to the listed building, without providing sufficient public benefit to outweigh the harm. As such, the proposal is contrary to CL4 of the Local Plan.

1)

Refused despite pre-app advice
To assist applicants in finding solutions to problems arising in relation to their development proposals the Local Planning Authority has produced planning policies, and provided written guidance, all of which are available on the Council's website, and offers a pre-application advice service. Pre-application advice was sought and provided. Unfortunately, this advice was not adhered to. Nevertheless, the Council is ready to enter into discussions with the applicants through the advice service to assist in the preparation of a new planning application.