Back to search results Details Decision Committee Appeal Contact Comment Documents Property details Case reference: PP/23/00968 Address: 81-103 King's Road, LONDON, SW3 4NX Ward: Royal Hospital Polling district: 16 Listed Building Grade: N/A Conservation area: Chelsea Applicant details Applicant's name: Kings Road Property Ltd Applicant company name: DP9 Contact address: 100 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5NQ Proposal details Application type: PP (Planning permission) Proposed development ***REVISED SCHEME AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS*** Demolition of existing building and redevelopment for new building up to four storeys and basement (Use Class E - commercial, business and service); roof terraces, landscaping works; installation of plant; and associated works. (MAJOR APPLICATION) Date received: 07 Feb 2023 Registration date: (Statutory start date) 06 Mar 2023 Public consultation ends: 28 Jul 2023 Application status: Pre-Determination Stage Target date for decision: 05 Jun 2023 Decision details This case has not yet been decided. Decision: Decision date: Conditions and reasons: Informatives: Committee details Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided by the Planning Committee. Date:05 Oct 2023Time:18:30Venue:The Council ChamberReport item number:ST15 Appeal details This case has not been appealed. Planning Inspectorate reference number: Appeal received: Appeal type: Appeal procedure: Appeal start date: Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate: Appeal decision: Appeal decision date: Contact details Planning case officer: Laura Fogarty Planning team: Strategic Developments Team Email: [email protected] Telephone: 020 7361 3012 Comment on this application By law all comments are open to public inspection as they form part of the statutory register for planning applications. Unless you specify otherwise when you finish your comment and submit it, we will redact your name and address and postcode. Certain other types of personal data you provide, such as your email address and signature, will be automatically redacted. Please note that the comments you make are in an open text box. This means that they will be visible to the public at large. Therefore, do not put any sensitive data (such as health or financial information) in this box which you do not want to be revealed to the public. Likewise, if you do not want your name and address revealed, do not write them in the text box. Reason for commenting General comments Support Objection * Comments I am commenting as an organisation or company an individual Organisation or company name Comments from organisations or companies are not subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 and the name of your organisation will be displayed on the Council's website. Data Protection Act 2018 information Comments are published anonymously on the Council's website until a planning decision or, if applicable, an appeal decision has been made. A redacted version of your comment will be available under FOI requests for 10 years, after which time it will be deleted. With your permission we will include your address when we publish your comments. I give permission for the Council to include my address when they publish my comments. With your permission your comments will remain on the website after a planning decision has been made and will be permanently available under FOI requests. I give permission for the Council to publish my comment after a planning decision has been made and to make comments permanently available under FOI requests. * Your name * Address line 1 Address line 2 Address line 3 Address line 4 Postcode Telephone number * Email address Attachments You may attach pictures or documents to support your comments. We can accept .jpg and .pdf files up to a total of 10MB. Attachments You will receive an email receipt after you have submitted your comment. There is a problem with your form. Please check the following: Documents related to case PP/23/00968 View the available documents on the Electronic Documents and Records Management Service. Opens in a new window. Click here to comment on this case