Back to search results Details Decision Committee Appeal Contact Comment Documents Property details Case reference: PP/04/01934 Address: 10 Lansdowne Walk, LONDON, W11 3LN Ward: Norland Polling district: 11 Listed Building Grade: N/A Conservation area: Ladbroke Applicant details Applicant's name: Mr. & Mrs. J. Carey, Applicant company name: Francis P. Gonzalez Associates, Contact address: 8 Montague Road, Ealing, London, W13 8HA Proposal details Application type: PP (Planning permission) Proposed development Form rear landing and access staircase to garden to replace existing structure and replacement conservatory. Date received: 02 Aug 2004 Registration date: (Statutory start date) 19 Aug 2004 Application status: Appeal Decided Target date for decision: 14 Oct 2004 Decision details This case has not yet been decided. Decision: Refuse Planning Permission/Consent Decision date: 14 Oct 2004 Conditions and reasons: The proposed landing/balcony and staircase by reason of their protrusion beyond the general building line of the terrace are considered to cause harm to the building, the terrace in which they are located and on the character and appearance of the Ladbroke Conservation Area, contrary to policies CD47, CD61 and CD62 of the Unitary Development Plan, thereby causing a significant increase in harm to amenity of neighbouring premises by reason of privacy and overlooking contrary to policies CD47 and CD35 of the Unitary Development Plan. The cumulative effect of which, if repeated elsewhere, will further degrade the terrace and fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. They are therefore also considered to be contrary to policies CD50 and CD51 of the Unitary Development Plan. The proposed trellis fence will also result in a sense of enclosure to the detriment of the neighbouring property at 11a Lansdowne Walk thereby failing to preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area. It is therefore considered contrary to policies CD36, CD61 and CD62 Informatives: Relevant Policies UsedYou are advised that a number of relevant policies of the Unitary Development Plan were used in the determination of this case, in particular, Policies CD27, CD33, CD35, CD36, CD47, CD48, CD50, CD51, CD61 and CD62. Committee details Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided under delegated powers. Appeal details This case has not been appealed. Planning Inspectorate reference number: A/05/1178216 Appeal received: 12 Apr 2005 Appeal type: REF (Refusal of Permission) Appeal procedure: WR (Written Representations) Appeal start date: 15 Apr 2005 Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate: 27 May 2005 Appeal decision: DIS Appeal decision date: 10 Aug 2005 Contact details Planning case officer: Kevin Plaster Planning team: North Email: [email protected] Telephone: 020 7361 3012 Comment on this application The consultation period for this application has ended. Documents related to case PP/04/01934 APPLICATION (Opens in a new window)OTHER (Opens in a new window)OTHER (Opens in a new window)OTHER (Opens in a new window)COMMITTEE NOTICE/REPORTS (Opens in a new window)DECISION NOTICE (Opens in a new window)APPROVED DRAWING (Opens in a new window)View the available documents on the Electronic Documents and Records Management Service. Opens in a new window.