1)
The roof terrace and associated raised parapet, would result in the rear addition rising higher than the eaves of the house and disrupting the even rhythm of rear additions in the terrace. Therefore, the proposal would harm the character and appearance of the building and the terrace in which it is situated and would be detrimental to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. Consequently, the proposal is contrary to the Council's Policies, as set out in the Unitary Development Plan, in particular, CD40, CD41, CD52 and CD53.
2)
The rear dormer, by reason of its location on an unaltered roofline would harm the character and appearance of the building and the terrace and would be detrimental to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. Therefore, the proposal is contrary to the Council's policies, as set out in the Unitary Development Plan, in particular Policies CD38, CD39, CD52 and CD53.
3)
The use of the roof terrace, by reason of its close proximity to neighbouring windows, would result in a loss of privacy to No.24 Limerston Street. Therefore, the proposal is contrary to the Council's Policies, as set out in the Unitary Development Plan, in particular Policies CD30 and CD40.