!DOCTYPE html> The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea | Planning Search

Planning Search

Back to search results

Property details

Case reference: PP/04/01550
Address: 24 Scarsdale Villas, LONDON, W8 6PR
Ward: Abingdon
Polling district: 01
Listed Building Grade: N/A
Conservation area: Edwardes Square/ Scarsdale/ Abingdon

Applicant details

Applicant's name: Mr. & Mrs. Lajam,
Applicant company name: D'Arcy Associates,
Contact address: 9 Lamington Street, London, W6 0HU

Proposal details

Application type: PP (Planning permission)
Proposed development Erection of rear extension at basement, ground floor and 1st floor half landing, and new windows to the side elevation at 1st floor, ground floor and basement level.
Date received: 09 Jul 2004
Registration date:
(Statutory start date)
09 Jul 2004
Application status: Appeal Decided
Target date for decision: 03 Sep 2004

Decision details

This case has not yet been decided.

Decision: Refuse Planning Permission/Consent
Decision date: 03 Sep 2004
Conditions and reasons:

1)

The proposal to construct a full-width extension at lower and upper ground floor levels as well as a half-width extension at first floor level on a largely unaltered property within a conservation area is considered excessive in terms of bulk and scale and will lead to the further erosion of the character and appearance of the property. The proposal is also considered to result in considerable harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding conservation area, which it fails to either preserve or enhance. The proposal is, therefore, considered not to comply with the Council's Unitary Development Plan policies, in particular, Policies CD27, CD33, CD36, CD47, CD48, CD57, CD61 and CD62.

2)

The proposed extensions at no.24, if constructed in isolation of the same scheme proposed at the adjoining property of no.22, would result in a sense of enclosure and loss of light to that property in particular. The proposal is, therefore, considered not to comply with the Council's Unitary Development Plan policies, in particular, Policies CD33 and CD36.

Informatives:

1)

Relevant Policies Used
You are advised that a number of relevant policies of the Unitary Development Plan were used in the determination of this case, in particular, Policies CD27, CD33, CD36, CD47, CD48, CD57, CD61 and CD62. (I51)

Committee details

Decision by: This case is currently due to be decided under delegated powers.

Appeal details

This case has not been appealed.

Planning Inspectorate reference number: A/04/1166835
Appeal received: 03 Nov 2004
Appeal type: REF (Refusal of Permission)
Appeal procedure: WR (Written Representations)
Appeal start date: 12 Nov 2004
Deadline for comments to be received by the Planning Inspectorate: 24 Dec 2004
Appeal decision: DIS
Appeal decision date: 05 May 2005

Contact details

Planning case officer:
Planning team: Fast Track Team
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 020 7361 3012

Comment on this application

The consultation period for this application has ended.